Viktorija Golubic vs Jodie Anna Burrage Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Mar at 08:39 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
V. Golubic vs J. Anna Burrage

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Golubic 1 - 0 Burrage
They have played 2 sets in total, with Viktorija Golubic winning 2 and Jodie Anna Burrage winning 0. The last match between Viktorija Golubic and Jodie Anna Burrage was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 02-03-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Viktorija Golubic getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Golubic | 1 |
| Burrage | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(03-02-25)
V. Golubic vs J. A. Burrage H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,605,821 | Career Prize Money | $610,536 |
| 60.47% (511-334) | Career Total W/L | 57.24% (261-195) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 19 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 40.00% (10-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (4-8) |
V. Golubic vs J. A. Burrage Match Preview:
How does the art of the second serve influence the fate of a tennis match? If we dive into the recent performances over the last six months, Burrage edges ahead, winning 41.35% of the points on their second serve, slightly outpacing Golubic, who manages 38.83%. An intriguing statistic, this, as it harbors significant insights that often align with match outcomes. Yet, what happens when the tables turn and it's about the return game? Here, Golubic takes the lead, winning 52.73% of points on her opponent's second serve compared to Burrage’s 48.91%. These percentages transform into powerful predictors of match dynamics, painting a picture of where advantages lie.
The capability to seize moments of pressure, a pivotal aspect in high-stakes tennis, also tips the scales. Analyzing the ability to fend off break points, Burrage again proves slightly more resilient, saving 56.69% of breakpoints against her, while Golubic is not far behind at 46.69%. For those with a keen interest in in-game betting, these statistics speak volumes about potential twists and turns in match momentum.
As we broaden our perspective to encompass an entire year, a clearer performance narrative unfolds. Burrage boasts a win rate of 62.5% (W/L 25/15), narrowly besting Golubic's 58.82% (W/L 30/21). Intriguingly, the surfaces themselves reveal their favorites, with both players finding their stride on the I. hard surface—Burrage at a 62% win rate and Golubic clearly dominant at 70%. However, when clay courts are involved, Burrage struggles more significantly than Golubic.
The quality of opposition faced presents another layer of complexity in gauging player capability. Burrage's recent opponents have had an average rank of 271.9, whereas Golubic consistently encounters players ranked around 169.22. This context offers an indispensable lens through which to predict how they might fare when directly pitted against one another.
The potential for a deciding set adds yet another dimension. Within the past year, Burrage has clinched victory in 50% of her deciding sets, whereas Golubic proves slightly more steadfast with a 54% success rate. And, when the chance to break presents itself, the capability to convert is pivotal—Golubic maintains a higher conversion rate at 38.18% compared to Burrage’s 29.18%, making Golubic a formidable opponent in tight situations.
When all layers of the statistical tapestry are weighed and measured, Golubic seems to hold a slight edge, particularly when considering her composure under pressure and level of opposition faced. Therefore, it would not be surprising to see Golubic claim victory, should the numbers maintain their current narrative.
Viktorija Golubic vs Jodie Anna Burrage Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
V. Golubic vs J. A. Burrage H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:10:21 | Average Match Time | 1:10:21 |
| 66% (27/41) | 1st Serve % | 34% (19/56) |
| 89% (24/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 57% (8/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (19/37) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (28/56) | Return Points Win % | 22% (9/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
V. Golubic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-1 4-6 7-5 | ||
QF | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 1-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | ||
J. A. Burrage Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(8) 6-2 | ||

V. Golubic vs J. A. Burrage Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.47% (511/334) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.24% (261/195) |
| 58.13% (1162/837) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.95% (598/434) |
| 53.13% (9840/8682) | Games Win/Loss | 53.33% (5088/4453) |
| 60.54% (178/116) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.07% (161/107) |
| 55.94% (160/126) | Clay Win/Loss | 30.43% (7/16) |
| 69.61% (126/55) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.61% (72/43) |
| 55.95% (47/37) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.00% (21/29) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 372 | Aces Total | 1722 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1768 | Total Double Faults | 1550 |
| 1:11:42 | Average Match Time | 1:25:24 |
| 433.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 240.7 |
| 67% (28618/42529) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16786/28600) |
| 60% (17081/28613) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11250/16786) |
| 46% (6344/13935) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5440/11814) |
| 49% (2739/5570) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1596/3429) |
| 47% (19834/42501) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12760/28746) |
| 50.00% (45/45) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (7/14) |
| 45.76% (27/32) | Masters W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 55.00% (132/108) | Main Tour W/L | 44.12% (30/38) |
| 68.62% (234/107) | Challenger W/L | 61.09% (168/107) |
| 65.98% (64/33) | Futures W/L | 67.50% (54/26) |
| 60% (505/838) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (257/448) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 52% (105/201) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (54/105) |
| 54% (167/311) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (48/127) |
| 86% (484/414) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (287/233) |
| 14% (484/70) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (287/52) |
| 27% (361/96) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (169/27) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Blockx H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
